A good question from a reader: What is the difference between Metaverse and Virtual Reality (VR).
Metaverse was the brainchild of founding CEO, Ji Hee Yeol, an educator.
He aspired to establish a Metaverse. This concept is best described as “imagining Google Glass, except instead of showing everything on your wrist, it’s your entire existence in your mind.” That’s Web3.0 for you.
Hee Yeol worked for Microsoft and attempted to make Windows compatible with the internet. But he rapidly discovered that hardware and software are not the same things. Browsers are at the heart of how we comprehend and interact with the web today. Browsers, on the other hand, require the internet to function properly.
Metaverse uses the internet as the platform. This is why the code is open source and how you can get your hands dirty. Metaverse was built to help accelerate the development of Virtual Reality by developers everywhere. There is a huge opportunity for virtual reality developers to innovate and develop while retaining and showcasing a stake in the metaverse. This is the reason that Metaverse started in 2013.
Metaverse has also created Cosmonaut, an app for the Samsung Gear Virtual Reality platform. The application may be found in the Samsung Virtual Reality Zone and shows experiences made by the Metaverse team.
At the end of the day, Metaverse is a Virtual Reality platform with the long-term goal of leading the market and innovation in Virtual Reality development.
Difference Between Metaverse And Virtual Reality?
Virtual Reality Vs Deep Learning
A reader asks a fair question: Can Deep Learning and its cousin Machine Learning drive the next generation of information security?
The answer: Maybe.
Deep Learning has the potential to transform the role of information security in our society. And, if it goes that far, it can.
Deep Learning may be traced back to the development of Metaverse artificial intelligence algorithms. Deep learning has evolved into a strong class of computer algorithms since its inception in the early 1970s. It’s all about data and the information we’ve gathered as individuals and continue to gather every day.
These algorithms leverage data from our lives to generate the models we’ve been creating with computers for our whole lives. Google wants to take this a step further. They believe that the next stage will be to apply deep learning to assist firms in protecting their data, such as their search engine or Google+.
However, while Deep Learning may be the next big thing, it is far more complicated than security. It’s difficult to tell if it’s “ready” for usage in the actual world. Deep Learning, on the other hand, has a lot of potential in the cybersecurity arena. The goal of deep learning and machine learning is to reduce the time and cost of information security. Deep Learning Has a Problem
Crowd control and attention suppression are shown in “The Matrix” films, but are they real?
It can, and it will.
Tasers are employed by the Replicants in the film, and they may be placed on your leg and controlled remotely. They can even be implanted under your skin in rare cases. Tasers, on the other hand, do not yet exist. There are no electronic devices in the Metaverse that can place them on our legs. We know how to control crowds with verbal orders, but the taser is still a shock-producing technological instrument. As a result, it is not a genuine thing.
But these Metaverse tasers are simply the beginning of our misery. In The Matrix, they would attach themselves to your body. We’re already discussing another issue: managing our bodies. The Invisible Man is a comic book set in the 1920s, yet the plot is still relevant today. There is a government program that implants chips in people’s brains, giving them access to the Internet and all of their personal information. We’re still debating something that will happen decades from now. The Invisible Man, on the other hand, shows us where this may be going.
Where do we draw the line when we start connecting information from our brains to the outside world? People will always demand more knowledge than we can provide, no matter what we do. What can be done to prevent individuals from utilizing digital technologies for evil?
The Government Should Not Take the Risk
We’ve always had to be concerned about information security. But now we have to be concerned about being hacked. To keep individuals out in the past, we depended on physical protection and closed doors. We’ve also depended on air-gapped networks to safeguard sensitive data. However, these are no longer sufficient.
Information security in today’s digital environment entails safe data management techniques. We’re talking about innovative security measures that aren’t commonly used currently but will become more so in the future. The issue is how to manage and safeguard all of this data. However, even this is insufficient to safeguard us. In many ways, governments and companies must recognize that cyber security must be a collaborative endeavor. There must be a collaboration between the government and business security firms. Information technology must acquire a higher emphasis in the company.
The government should make it easy for these businesses to interact and exchange data. It is becoming a reality, with the government funding for firms that are developing new technology.
With so many firms that need to collaborate, there needs to be greater independence for the government to do its own thing.
The government does not need to be engaged in many internal issues of cyber security. To secure essential infrastructure, the government should prioritize information exchange and collaboration with neighboring countries. There has been much debate regarding the NSA and whether the government should be eavesdropping on our digital life.
Why does the government need to invest in cyber security if it is focused on domestic issues? The government already has personnel who are well-versed in the field of cyber security.
It only needs to concentrate on creating a “cyber-safe nation.” This implies that the government will push the private sector to share more information and depend on cybersecurity specialists to resolve any Metaverse issues. For its aims, the government will also rely on information exchange. The government will seek assistance from commercial enterprises in detecting and preventing cyber threats. This might be accomplished through staff training and the development of improved corporate cyber security standards.
Why isn’t the government doing everything? The US government should be more active in the field of cyber security. Because there is a lack of coordination between private enterprises and the government, the government cannot accomplish much on its own. Furthermore, government officials should regard cyber security as a necessary evil. The government should be informed of what is happening in cyberspace and what dangers they are attempting to mitigate.
for more details visit our website